UFO Conjecture(s)

Monday, July 07, 2008

Why ufologists need UFOs to be extraterrestrial

2conquest.jpg

We’ve raised some ire because of our suggestion a few months back that UFOs will only be explained when the UFO old-guard dies off, and a new breed of ufologist takes over.

http://ufoprovo.blogspot.com/2008/03/deaths-will-clean-ufo-palate.html

And a recent note from Chile -- http://inexplicata.blogspot.com/2008/07/chile-dying-days-of-ufology.html -- bemoaned the death of that country’s ufology stalwarts.

But why are old-guard ufologists so antsy or anxious to indicate or prove that UFOs are extraterrestrial in origin?

Some of the questions that might be asked of alien visitors are these:

What is the life-span of your species?

How does your species procreate?

2fortean.jpg

How does maintain your species remain healthy?

What medicines or medical techniques can you share with Earthlings (to prolong their lives or make them better)?

2bug.jpg

Is death inevitable or has your species overcome death (except by Roswellian “accidents”)?

2accident.jpg

Is there life after death?

Do you have a God?

mochica2.jpg

And so on…

You see, the UFO old-guard doesn’t just want to clear up the UFO mystery; there’s a survival instinct at work nowadays among those who’ve reached senility and are knocking at death’s door.

The Halls. Friedmans, Randles, Schuesslers, Steigers, even Clarks et al. are near that time when they’ll be meeting the grim reaper, as we’ve already noted.

2brad.jpg

So, of course, they’d like to know the answers to the questions above, for a number of reasons but most of all because they have concern – personal concern! – for how alien beings might answer them.

Therefore, those ufologists zero in on the extraterrestrial hypothesis because it may help them through those final years of their Earthly lives.

It’s not scientific, but when has ufology been scientific?

Now the job is getting our hands on alien visitors and pumping them for the ultimate answers to life – not for their sakes, but for ours, especially the old dogs of ufology.

4 Comments:

  • Regardless of whether intended or not, this is the funniest piece of nonsense I have read on the subject for a while.

    If humour is a new diversion for you Rich then we need to be told in advance so as to know whether it is in fact OK to laugh or whether we should really feign contempt and just laugh in the privacy of our own cyber worlds.

    I'm curious Rich; aren't you keen to know the answer to your own question as well?

    By Blogger Stuart, at Monday, July 07, 2008  

  • Stuart,

    Rich is so old that I think the questions suit him more than they suit persons like yourself.

    I'm not sure the piece, inspired by but not written by Rich, is meant to be tongue-in-cheek or not.

    Max

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Monday, July 07, 2008  

  • 'ere Mush,

    Whadaya mean "suit persons like yourself?"

    I'm certainly younger and most definitely a lot prettier than Rich.

    By Blogger Stuart, at Tuesday, July 08, 2008  

  • Younger, yes, Stuart....

    A lot prettier? I don't think so.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Tuesday, July 08, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home