UFO Conjectures

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Dr. Michael Persinger and EM stimuli: UFOs

Bruce Duensing is a devotee of Dr. Michael Persinger, a theoretical psychologist (as I see him).

Dr. Persinger insists that electromagnetic waves stimulate the mind, producing images and experiences that become "reality" for those affected.

He answers his critics HERE and I suggest you Google his name to find his erudite work and ruminations on the ephemeral, yet "real," manifestations that EM evokes in some persons.

While his studies don't account for all UFO events or sightings, they can help explain many.

UFO mavens should not ignore the Persinger papers.



  • "Dolphins in two separate research centers understood the words, presenting convincing evidence that dolphins employ a universal “sono-pictorial” language of communication."


    By Blogger Frank Stalter, at Tuesday, November 29, 2011  

  • I just received a difficult to locate copy of his "The Weather Matrix and Human Behavior" which was found as a old accessioned library hardcover. Even if these studies do not shed light for some on the complexities of this phenomenon, this is a great read for those who have an intellectual curiosity on leading edge science. There is enough material on relationships in human perception to weather in this book ( (barometric pressure-infrasound) ( electric fields and atmospheric ions) that to me, its a revelation that is rare that it is science, not some goofy thing about aliens building pyramids.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Thursday, December 01, 2011  

  • I really don't think I have been effected as profoundly by a post on the UFO Iconoclasts as this one, yet. I spent most all of the morning yesterday, as I could while at the office, enthusiastically poised in response to the UFOI entry from Nov. 29th. As I ruminated and pressed myself for a self convicted response to what I feel is the ULTIMATE UFO Challenge, as per usual over the course of the last 1-2 years, it became refined as new within my mind that the truth (instinctively, IMO) lies internally within us, rather than externally without us. I do not believe that UFOs represent a fabrication, or "trick" of the mind as much as I believe that our minds are not yet conditioned or developed enough to perceive accurately the metaphysical reality that UFOs represent to, and for, us.

    I think that in this context, singularity may have been incorrectly perceived, or identified, based on a tremendous subconscious 'draw" from the mass collective that searches tirelessly for an answer to this enigma. That, or we are all a part of some memory based aspect ratio flow chart in which our entire reality construct is nothing but an ongoing monitored study by future oriented human beings, mantis men, or Bozo The Clown for all that matters. Either way, it's just a guess as to who's responsible for such a matrix. Logically, from this same furthered perspective, we could easily conclude that humanity's existence itself is a huge question mark. I'm sorry, whereas I do understand, and have like so many, been hit between the eyes via the matrix revelation as being the only "plausible" answer to such a broad ranging paradoxical quandary as the UFO phenomena, I just don't buy it because of the tremendous lean on what is clearly a contemporary human time line based, personification, as quandary reconciliation.

    I am now looking in the fascinating direction of DR. Persinger as being the possible directive towards an accurately defined singularity. A singularity end product that does in no way depend on composite artificial intelligence, but rather one that joins us internally, in a self contained fashion, wherein our spacetime/holographic environment becomes in embryonic fashion, fully visible (furthered accessible) to us in the same way that UFOs already access this, as of yet, esoteric expanse that we currently only receive fleeting glimpses of.

    Bruce: This information relating to Persinger and the Laurentian University, is roughly 10-15 years old. Can you, via paraphrase, basically fill us in on where this R&D is, cutting edge, presently? I am not referring here to the Helmet or God Experience, but rather "reality as interval related weak EMW brain stimulation. Is Persinger stating that ALL of reality/experience may in fact be the result of our perceived EM stimulus, or that EM stimulus can inject and effectively "patch" reality? Were you already familiar with Martin Cannon's mention of DR. Persinger's efforts? If you have already posted as much, which via the relatively recent revelation to me of this amazing network of thinkers that you are a part of here, seems likely, just point me to it via a link as I am eager to get "caught up". Thanks/Jeff

    By Blogger Jeff Davis, at Saturday, December 03, 2011  

Post a Comment

<< Home