Oldest Cave Art not about extraterrestrials or UFOs but about.....er, um....
posted by RRRGroup at
Monday, May 14, 2012
About
About Me
- Name: RRRGroup
- Location: Ann Arbor/Fort Wayne, Michigan/Indiana, United States
A group of media guys
Previous
- 1943!
- Roswell’s “Flying Disk”?
- UFOs: Is the medium the message or is the message ...
- A.D. After Disclosure -- an unkind review
- Roswell: A lack of debris and a lack of (almost) e...
- Flying Saucers/UFOs devolve into a bad mythology
- UFOs of the Mind
- Jose Caravaca and The Laxton sighting: Distortion!...
- The source of the Travis Walton abduction tale?
- Ufology: A lack of scientific protocols and nuance...
5 Comments:
Is this a Rorschach? Cuz, I don't see a female sex organ (but I might see a males...) Nice bit of levity here, gentlemen. Much appreciated.
By
Cullan Hudson, at Monday, May 14, 2012
Cullan:
We saw nuttin'....nuttin' I tell you.
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Monday, May 14, 2012
Procreation and sustenance. Why wouldn't the most important aspects of life be the first to be memorialized in art?
By
purrlgurrl, at Monday, May 14, 2012
I would think that primitive peoples, PG, were so stressed out by their environmental hazards (animals, reptiles, weather, food-needs) that the sexual aspect of their lives (the biological desires or needs) would be secondary at best.
To memorialize sexual parts and/or activity, under the circumstances of living (survival even) corroborates Freud's view of human proclivities.
RR
RR
By
RRRGroup, at Monday, May 14, 2012
Freudian? Rorschach? I hope not because I could only see the horse's ass.
By
Kandinsky, at Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Post a Comment
<< Home