UFO Conjecture(s)

Wednesday, May 08, 2013

Noted Flying Saucer and/or UFO Landings up to and including 1969

1951c.jpg

Click HERE for a listing, from the Catoe Library of Congress UFO/flying saucer Bibliography for 1969, of book and magazine (et cetera) articles that dealt with alleged landings of flying saucers or UFOs.

RR

5 Comments:

  • I do not understand Catoe's list. Surely by 1969 there were a vast number of reported contacts and landings. Even Adamski's 3 books are omitted. What about Bethurum, van Tassel and the numerous others, some well-known others obscure.

    This Catoe list looks pretty sparse to me!

    By Blogger cda, at Wednesday, May 08, 2013  

  • CDA:

    You didn't read my first note about the Bibliography.

    I culled listings of reports we've dealt with here or some I thought needed airing.

    I have selected the items from hundreds in the Bibliography.

    The Bibliography is comprehensive, I assure you.

    The Adamski and common reports we are all familiar with I have excluded except for a few that will show up later that have elements not generally known.

    You have got to read more carefully my postings.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Wednesday, May 08, 2013  

  • Quite right. I did read your notes carelessly.

    Catoe's list obviously deals only with contacts and, apart from the Hills, omits the abductions since the great majority of the latter were post-1969 (or were written about post-1969 anyway).

    Think of the size of such a listing were one to be produced now.

    You would need an encyclopedia!

    By Blogger cda, at Wednesday, May 08, 2013  

  • There are Hill listings, and Allingham's thing. and much, much more.

    I've only pulled a portion so far, but have a slew I will be putting up soon.

    The Bibliography provides all that had been written or provided (news shows, cartoons, print media, et cetera) about flying saucers and/or UFOs: Air Force documents, conspiracy theories, and tons of far-out conjectures.

    Everything [sic] available about the topic from before 1947 up through 1969.

    It is truly comprehensive.

    I'll get to them ASAP.

    (I'd provide the Bibliography intact, except that I don't want to provide it to the slackers who stop by here, take material, and pretend they originated it...you know whom I mean)

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Wednesday, May 08, 2013  

  • ...thank you for posting a pulp cover featuring the work of the incomparable Heinlein!

    oh yeah, I also am of the opinion that whatever Socorro was, it was not a made up story, but something that Zamora didn't understand...

    (...it is simply sad that so many 'UFO experts' are unaware of the concept of TANSTAAFL....)

    By Blogger Kurt Peters, at Thursday, May 09, 2013  

Post a Comment

<< Home