UFO Conjecture(s)

Saturday, June 01, 2013

Gone but not forgotten…

sand.jpg

Those of you who saw or commented on a post here entitled “Silence of the Lambs” can now see that the post has been deleted.

It had gotten out of hand.

Bruce Duensing left a comment just before I deleted the post: What a circus!

He was right.

People were pointing fingers rather than addressing the issue at hand – that someone who really knows what’s going on with the discovery of  “new [Roswell] evidence” should step up and disclose it, to the UFO community before outsiders – news media and/or cable shows – get their hands on it.

There were some valuable comments but they are gone – collateral damage.

Further comments, placed here, that are like those that took the post down will be deleted out of hand.

Sorry to be dictatorial, but that’s my prerogative.

RR 

18 Comments:

  • I agree that any discovery that would change the course of how we view ourselves was to be put in a non disclosure agreement among legally bound conspirators is, in of itself, a criminal act. Legalisms or not, perhaps this is a test case for emotional intelligence, and if so, the results are self evident and require no further editorialising.
    Example:

    I read an article recently about John Mack's death in Vanity Fair, and the first comment that was published was a self advertising comment from an abductee about a pending movie contract, meeting the Pleiadians on a mountaintop..heres my website address. I kid you not. This in response to a well researched respectful article by a renowned investigative journalist.on John Mack, not on abductees.
    Some topics are akin to sshhh..not around the children. This phenomenon brings out the worst in everyone, myself included.
    As Walt Kelley said, We have met the enemy and they are us.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Saturday, June 01, 2013  

  • I'd like to avoid bringing up any comments about a non-disclosure; that's one of the items that brought down the "gone" post.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Saturday, June 01, 2013  

  • I was not aware of that. I must be sort of thick about social cues. Sorry about that. Feel free to strike my comment.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Saturday, June 01, 2013  

  • It's okay....but I don't want to give it more attention than it deserves.

    The matter is iffy apparently.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Saturday, June 01, 2013  

  • Well, at least we have the delightful irony of you posting about how you dictatorially took down another post, right after you excoriated the fascistic tendencies of UFO mavens.

    See... Roswell serves a useful purpose after all. ;-)

    PK

    By Blogger Paul Kimball, at Saturday, June 01, 2013  

  • There is a difference --subtle as it may be: I took down my own material at the same time.

    No one was immune from my temporary fascism.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Saturday, June 01, 2013  

  • chief, you have just called it "a circus". I'm very surprised by your surprise, and very surprised by the loud silence of kevin randle. I've posted a comment on kevin's blog with the link on aztec/roswell post by RRR.
    I like very much the great job that kevin made, and still make.
    I liked very much last book of kevin, but I'm very surprised by this "strange" behaviour.

    By Blogger ilfakiro, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • The topic have come and gone very quickly indeed, because I never saw it!

    A 24-hour flash-in-the-pan?

    By Blogger cda, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • On the one had we have the blog author whetting appetites with hints of something significant afoot in terms of the Roswell case, and on the other we have Kevin Randle claiming that nothing of note has been discovered.

    Has it turned out to be a damp squib, and so is now being repudiated lest it further muddy waters it was intended to make less opaque?

    All very inscrutable

    By Blogger Ross Evans, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • Ross...

    We'll just have to wait, it seems, to determine who is right and who is wrong.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • What a "bummer".

    Now I'll have to go back to blogging about UFOs and military bases, fading witness memories, claims of cover-ups.)

    By Blogger Tim Hebert, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • Mr. RR and Mr. Kimball-

    FYI - in our too modern world, nothing is ever gone, as this demonstrates

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:http://ufocon.blogspot.com/2013/06/silence-of-lambs.html

    By Blogger Chuck Finley, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • Yes, CF, our "misdeeds" will haunt us forever.

    Mea culpa.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Sunday, June 02, 2013  

  • hello, today I've just found a comment by "steve sawyer" on kevin randle's blog defining my previous post (with a link on this blog) "scurrilous" !!!!!
    I think that at this point kevin randle, which I consider a gentleman, should take a strong position on this topic.
    this is the link with my comment and the reply from steve sawyer:
    http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=11558306&postID=7597206556507173953&page=1&token=1370437584616

    By Blogger ilfakiro, at Wednesday, June 05, 2013  

  • ilfakiro provides the following comment:

    hello, today I've just found a comment on kevin randle's blog defining my previous post (with a link on this blog) "scurrilous" !!!!!
    I think that at this point kevin randle, which I consider a gentleman, should take a strong position on this topic"

    We have edited ilfakiro's comment to eliminate the name of the person who posted the comment at Kevin's and the link to that comment as we do not accept anything from the person who created it.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Wednesday, June 05, 2013  

  • RRR, what do you think about this awesome situation?
    you have posted a theory which I think goes in the right direction.
    why this silence?

    By Blogger ilfakiro, at Wednesday, June 05, 2013  

  • ilfakiro...

    If Kevin Randle lets the comment by you-know-who stand at his blog, I will present what his Dream Team has found -- the "new evidence" -- here.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Wednesday, June 05, 2013  

  • thanks!

    By Blogger ilfakiro, at Wednesday, June 05, 2013  

Post a Comment

<< Home