The UFO Iconoclast(s)

Friday, September 27, 2013

AUTHENTIC ALIEN IMAGES FROM ROSWELL FINALLY FOUND? by Anthony Bragalia

THE TRUTH

In the past few months rumors have swirled that members of the Roswell investigation team (this author included) had become aware of two photographic slides depicting an alien humanoid creature:

- This is true, and it is equally true that they may represent the first genuine physical evidence in support of the reality of a crash of a extraterrestrial beings near Roswell, NM over six decades ago.

-The stunning, historic photographs have been confirmed to have been  imaged on two Kodachrome slides dating from the year 1947, the year of the UFO crash.  

-There is no indication of retouching, digital enhancement or other photographic hoax technique.

-They are clear, in color, up close, and taken from two separate angles.

-These slides were found hidden in an attic in a chest having belonged to a deceased couple.

-This author made the incredible discovery that the husband was a very prominent petroleum geologist who conducted oil exploration expeditions in the 1940s in West TX and in New Mexico. This area also encompassed the Permian Basin, a region that includes Roswell, NM.

-Rather than depicting the popular culture image of aliens in the 1940s, they show the image of a small humanoid  alien, like those aliens described by witnesses to Roswell.

-Other photos found in the chest (separate from the two humanoid slides) depict General Eisenhower in 1947 and with the couple at meetings and parties with what appear to be very well-placed people.

-There is much more of this tale to tell

WHAT IS NOT TRUE

-No crash debris or the craft itself are shown, this is pure fiction.

-No member of the team owns, manages or controls the evidence in any way, and therefore has not made any media inquiries as rumored and makes no decisions on what is done or not done with such evidence.

-We do not in any way represent or speak for the owner of the evidence. We were only assisting him.

LEAKS AND WHAT WENT WRONG

leak.jpg 
There was most certainly a leak in the investigation. Some people became aware of some of the elements of the story…and what some did with this is truly shameful. 

And others were reduced to name-calling in efforts to get us to talk.  I even received strange phone calls in the middle of the night demanding disclosure! People actually tried to extort information on this. It is clear that there are many who were simply jealous of our efforts and dislike the idea of a team.  They took a perverse pleasure in deliberately disrupting our continuing investigation. They do not see that they have caused tremendous harm to the pursuit of truth.

Why did they not wait until we had the time to understand more about the slide’s origin, provenance and chain-of-custody? And just why are we under any obligation to apprise strangers of things that we ourselves are still learning about?

Why was it so urgent for them to not first let us try to answer the many “who, what, where, whens , whys and hows” about these images that still remain before blabbering their mouths?

If we did not have these answers at the ready when the evidence was presented, we would be taken to task for not having those answers. We are damned if we do not pre-maturely release the information- and we would be damned if we did.

Why do some wish to bring down this aspect of the investigation and abort our sincere efforts? Are they so frustrated in not being able to see the images (some seem to being have mini-strokes and conniption fits because they have not) that they will do anything to make us release them? Do they seek fame at any cost? Do they not like us? Is it covetous behavior?

ON KEVIN

And when it was found out that Roswell researcher Kevin Randle still had concerns about the slides, the skeptics and mean-spirited wanted to drive a wedge further and deep within the team.  Kevin is entitled to his opinion. We remain civil and he is entitled to his thoughts. On this matter I am convinced that once he became privy to the evidence in a more direct way, he would have changed his mind.

People do not understand that the ‘team’ can have disagreements and still cooperate. They also do not appreciate that it is self-funded, takes time away from making a living, and its members are physically separated by thousands of miles. To then be further encumbered by an early onslaught of negativity before we have even completed our work on this evidence is simply unfair.

WHAT I WILL NOT ANSWER

 notalk.jpg
In order to salvage what little is left of privacy in this investigation (and to honor commitments to others) I will not answer questions relative to:

-The names of the involved geologist and his wife nor the owner of the slides; who authenticated them and how; when the chest was found and the name of who found it; and specifics on the humanoid’s appearance. Anyone who does release this sensitive information really does not care about history and truth, only themselves. They are not honorable and are fame seekers and worse.

-Who has seen the photos and when and where, how they are stored, etc.

-What stage we are at in the investigation; who was contacted during the investigation

-Speculation on the decision masking processes of the owner of the evidence

WHY YOU WILL NOT SEE THE PHOTOS

 aliend.jpg
The owner of the slides certainly sees from afar the puerile and unprofessional behavior of some people.  And he sees judgment cast even before the evidence is shown. He is likely repulsed by such “UFO people” and has no desire to enter such a hellish lion’s den. And he will not use the underbelly of the internet to ever release something of such enormity and cosmic  import.

AJB 

59 Comments:

  • Anthony,


    So, what exactly is the point of this screed? In synopsis

    'Ner ner, we've found compelling evidence relating to Roswell, but it is to be forever kept a secret, revealed only to members of the society of Roswellian onanists'

    And do please stop pretending that the serendipitous sibling are somehow holding back because they are aghast at all the opprobrium coming from a few people on a minority interest blog.

    For the record, my concern when I first became aware of this was that if the evidence was as compelling as was being suggested, the longer it stayed undisclosed, the greater the opportunity for those with a vested interest in it vanishing to make that happen.

    It wasn't jealousy, or a desire to steal anyone's thunder, it was a concern that, given their history of screw-ups, those working on this would make a mess of it. My fears stand vindicated

    Signing non-disclosure agreements! Amateur night. Forgive my cynicism here Anthony, but in searching for truth why would anyone involve themselves in a legally binding contract of silence? You don't think that request should have given you an indication of the kind of person you were dealing with?

    All this smoke and mirrors and yet it is blatantly obvious that the Dreamers inability to provide a sufficiently commodious brown envelope is the only reason you don't have those slide in your possession.

    By Blogger Ross, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • A load of rubbish.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • “For the unwise man ’tis best to be mute
    when he come amid the crowd,
    for none is aware of his lack of wit
    if he wastes not too many words;
    for he who lacks wit shall never learn
    though his words flow ne’er so fast.”

    By Blogger Lance, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • "What we have here is a failure to communicate..."

    Or not?

    A man in the middle attack, possibly to conceal or divert (delay) attention from sabotage at source?

    Until now, I didn't bother counting.

    It's all so amusing but for the possibility that, if Redfern (and others) are correct, it's likely both disturbing and sad.

    I don't discount the possibility that some intel contractor is engaged in a training exercise. Cue sound of pneumatic tube... Likely it's just another day in "ufology".

    By Blogger The Puppetburglar, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • All of this has happened before:

    http://redstarfilms.blogspot.ca/2013/09/the-roswell-slides-deja-vu-all-over.html

    By Blogger Paul Kimball, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • Lance
    "Authentic Alien Images" based on absent evidence. Poor Tony seems to be wagging the dog again, or as KR put it, "screwing the pooch."

    Reading his tomes are a painful exercise in terms of hubris inflated with hyperbole, and a dearth of critical thinking.

    The boy who cried wolf..once too often has been hoisted by his own self serving flim flam.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • Paul
    You stole my Yogi Berra line!
    Has anyone else noticed that Tony cannot stop blabbering about this while he professes a need for secrecy...LOL

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • ...this proves, as I have long thought, that Professor Braglia was added to 'The Dream Team (tm)' as an easy quick solution to their continuing problem of making Professor Rudiak seem reasoned, cautious and thoughtful....

    By Blogger Kurt Peters, at Friday, September 27, 2013  

  • The boy who cried wolf..once too often has been hoisted by his own self serving flim flam.

    Give credit where credit is due - Bragalia is a competent digger of data... perhaps even more than competent. The problem is that he's just that - a digger, and nothing more. He can no more interpret the usefulness of whatever data he finds, much less its meaning, than a worker in a uranium mine can manufacture an atomic bomb.

    The real and proven flim flam artist is Schmitt. Always has been, and always will be. That the rest of the "team" allowed him to be the front man - heck, that they even agreed to work with him at all - should tell everyone all that they need to know about the DT.

    As Kevin himself wrote in 1995:

    "He (Schmitt) will lie about anything. He will lie to anyone… He has revealed himself as a pathological liar… I will have nothing more to do with him."

    A hard-learned conclusion that was sadly forgotten.

    PK

    By Blogger Paul Kimball, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • OMG...what the heck? Who do you guys think you are? Who are you to demand anything at all?

    People like Tony don't confide in you, and so you feel slighted? He owes you absolutely zilch!!

    We should feel lucky to be even slightly connected to anything that happens in this realm. What are YOU doing to contribute?

    Are you spending your time and money to find anything at all?

    I happen to agree, slightly, with Rich with his Aztec is Roswell scenerio. Why? Because every time I have pointed out that SF author Wilkie Conner beat absolutely everybody to the punch, by at least a week, ala Aztec, it is ignored by everybody.

    Tony has at least acknowledged that it is interesting, every one else is so full of themselves that they just keep on their heading, without even the slightest variation of course.

    How could that information not be telling. It came long before Newton and company...long before. They aren't even mentioned.
    Its all about ego.

    If this doesn't get published, I understand.

    Rant over.

    By Blogger Bob Koford, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • You know you have to see Bragalia's latest uh revelations and the Roswell myth as a whole in proper perspective. What I mean is in context of the frightening, scary world we live in, that is just getting more scary every day and in every way.

    You just have to laugh. We are laughing at you Bragalia, not with you.

    By Blogger Lawrence, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • I would like to make it known that "Ross" is one of the individuals who has tried to sabotage research efforts on this investigation.

    The truth about this very strange no-person is that he has been stalking me by sending creepy unsolicited emails to my private email address. I suspect he is also calling me and not leaving messages.

    Just late last night this freakish individual emailed me an attachment of a picture of the geologist's wife, with nothing else- just the picture. Very creepy. How he got it and why he sent it concerns. But of course that was his intention.

    The implication was that he somehow had access to some of our research and that he was either going to expose it or use it against me in some way. A truly sick and troubled individual- and I am telling him here and now to stop bothering me at my home. I do not know who you are nor do I care to.

    This "Ross" is to be avoided. He is a fame-seeker and 'wanna-be insider' who has questionable motives and will even undercut ongoing research to "be someone."

    I fear that he has other information that he will release that will truly end any possibility that anyone will ever see the photos.

    I do not wish to address you directly but Ross- the 'minority interest' blog community's reaction to evidence that has not even yet been presented is representative of the larger world. He would experience the kind of knee-jerk dismissal that the is reflected in these comments. If I were him, I would run away from the likes of you fast.

    AJB

    By Blogger Anthony Bragalia, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • Paul
    I agree with you in terms of Tony's native ability to dig. What becomes an issue for me is related to your observation of his putting the cart in front of the horse, fueling it with hyperbole without real substance.
    Having served for many years on senior management teams investigating this or that to create policy, the Dream Team is simply a loose confederation of believers.
    What crossed the line was the lying, deceit and worst of all, Tony taking advantage of innuendo to accuse Rich of lying.
    Now he is accusing Ross of stalking. Who to believe?
    This end run around substantive discussion has always been the bane of this subject.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • Bob
    How much further can the subject be cheapened?

    "Given the current state of the field, it is probably more productive for me to continue quiet research behind the scenes rather than trying to speak publicly. I have been declining all interviews because anything I would say would be lost in the noise. People just want to hear about Roswell and abductions, and they already know the answers, so they don't need research. They are simply looking for confirmation of what they already believe. Cordially, Jacques." Correspondence to Lorin Cutts, 2012.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • Anthony,

    Please come back to reality.

    I emailed you no picture, rather 2 newspaper clippings which pertained to Mrs Geologist and her circle of friends. I shared the self same with Rich.

    You clearly missed the subtext; restraint is granted, not demanded.

    I am not the person calling you in the middle of the night, to even assume I'd be so inclined bespeaks your ignorance.

    Where I the incorrigible glory seeker you seem to think, I'd simply table an offer for the material in question.


    By Blogger Ross, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • Anthony,


    To even speaker of being an 'insider' is to demonstrate that you've been bewitched by all this.

    Me? I've never wanted to be a insider, I can scarcely imagine anything more stultifying and dreary. Hell is indeed other people; doubly so when one is engaged with a Dream Team.

    Amicus Plato, sed magis amica veritas

    By Blogger Ross, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • AJB's revelations are the best news since sliced bread (whenever that was).

    In fact they are far better news than sliced bread. And better than sliced ham, sliced cheese, even sliced baloney.

    By Blogger cda, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • I actually agree, for the most part, with Tony and Bob, insofar as I'm not aware of any circumstances in which researchers are compelled to release their data and on-going research material until they are good and ready. That's just not how research is done, and anybody who has ever done a Phd of any description would tell you that. If the slides were to be released at some point anyway, then sooner rather than later would make no difference whatever to their value or lack thereof. And if the slides are junk, as most people seem to believe, then it's not like something of genuine significance were being withheld from the general public.

    I'm curious though about the last paragraph - does that mean that the slides will not be released via the internet, or that they won't be released at all?

    By Blogger Tristan Eldritch, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • I agree with Tristan in the theoretical sense - there is no obligation on a researcher to release his findings until he has actually completed his research (and usually then gets published). But that general rule - which is a good one - goes flying out the window when the researchers start releasing their materials piecemeal, in this case writing books about some of it (Schmitt and Carey), or blogging about it (Bragalia), or telling others about it or commenting on it (all of them). At that point they are trying to have it both ways (in the case of S & C, for profit and attention; in the case of AB, for attention and ego-gratification), and have lost the right to claim that some of the information is privileged.

    Here's what they all should have done when rumours surfaced of the slides - keep your mouths shut. 100%. Absolutely. Don't comment. Don't say anything. Just do your work and release it when you're ready. I would respect and support that. But that's not what they did. They started commenting, and spreading half truths and untruths... and that's when they revealed that they aren't really researchers, and they aren't really interested in an objective search for the truth.

    PK

    By Blogger Paul Kimball, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • "On this matter I am convinced that once he became privy to the evidence in a more direct way, he would have changed his mind."

    I sense a temporal distortion...

    By Blogger Parakletos, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • Business as usual for ufology (all of it, regardless of who is most trustworthy and not). What a shame.

    By Blogger mheiser, at Saturday, September 28, 2013  

  • Kimball-

    How dare you blame the victim! A leak occured and because we are not able to effectively bottle it up we are at fault?

    What you have done by releasing private email communication from my associate Kevin Randle shows that no one can ever trust you. Nobody will ever dare email you their private thoughts without fear you would then publish them in a public forum. In one action you have "undone" your years of UFO work by revealing yourself as a double-crosser and squeal. Even in prison people like you are considered the very lowest of the low. If it were me that someone did this to- I would hire a lawyer to initiate legal action. Or I would get someone from my old stomping grounds in the Italian section of Boston (the North End) to pay the snitch a "site visit."

    Folks, it is very likely that Paul Kimball has betrayed the private communication of others. If he has done it once, he has done it before and perhaps will again.

    Anyone who has emailed Paul in the past would do well to review their "sent" files to Paul to make sure that you never sent anything that he could use against you, blackmail you, or in other ways satisfy his sordid ego.

    Can any of you imagine if you brother, mother, neighbor or friend published on various websites emails you had sent to them meant for their eyes only? Can you even imagine the sense of betrayal?

    In Kimball's distorted rationalization of his sabotage, he makes Kevin sound guilty of murder. Pathetic. Kimball gives the Judas Kiss.

    Bob Koford / Tristan Eldrich:

    Thanks for the comments. It truly is unbelievable that you two are the only ones commenting here that "get its." :

    No investigative team has an obligation to report on something before they are ready. and to prematurely publish without all the facts in jeopardizes the investigation's ability to ever provide much-needed answers.

    And to all of you who helped sabotage our investigation- why?

    Live with knowledge that you did the exact opposite of what you have hoped for all of these years. Because of your egos, you have likely denied the world the opportunity to see the unearthly.

    AJB


    By Blogger Anthony Bragalia, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • It is interesting to note that Tony thinks that revealing a public lie is the act of a Judas, when he was party to the lie that was revealed.

    Then in an act of poorly aimed deflection away from lying he transfers his part and others engaged in to a "victim" with a sense of trumped up morality.

    Tony then says it is Paul who lost all credibility.

    Astonishing..

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • When I read the responses of Mr. Bragalia and, sadly, Kevin Randle, I know beyond any doubt that I absolutely did the right thing.

    PK

    By Blogger Paul Kimball, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • Yes, Paul...

    You have provided the correctives that elucidate this farce.

    That's what real historians and truth-tellers do.

    I'm not angry with Kevin, nor have I abandoned Tony Bragalia.

    I think these two basically good guys have become infected with the Roswell virus, and just need inoculations, which you have provided, thankfully.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • A little less hyperbole, and the insertion of maybe and perhaps in Tony's posts would create more focus on the subject.

    We all make mistakes and this whole episode as they say is hopefully a learning experience.

    The issue as I see it is that one gets caught in refuting falsehoods when it is simply a matter on the other side of saying this could have been handled differently.

    Then let's move on..Personally Tony, Kevin etc were well meaning and got caught up in the toxic aspects of this as we are all sometimes exposed to.

    There is much more to life than this or so I would hope.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • ET/UFO Disclosure ... President Kennedy was assassinated solely because he was asking questions about UFOs.

    By Blogger David Howard, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • No Mr Howard, JFK was assassinated because he told Marilyn Monroe the UFO truth one night when they shared a bed. That's why she was 'assassinated' too, a year earlier.

    By Blogger cda, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • Actually Anthony the only party really to blame for all this's the leaker which begs the questions who leaked and why?

    I seriously doubt you've become such a glutton for punishment you couldn't wait for another session with the Cat o' Nine Tales which kind o' implies the slides' owner or/and their cohort(s) thought something'd be gained by it.

    Subce they're gettin' all the attention they could possibly want but're clearly unhappy about it that leaves money to my mind.

    If you've ever read Dave Harrison's Trade With Dave blog you'll know he trains his sales people to be unavailable to rake in the shekels.

    Pop stars like Bowie an' Prince've pulled the stunt of gettin' all the more media attention and thus record sales by lamenting "I vant to be halone..."

    You're attributing highminded sensitivities to the slides' owner and you might be right but be careful lest you're not.

    By Blogger alanborky, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • Of course this JFK folklore has nothing to do with demonstrable facts versus an equally demonstrated
    act of setting postulates as a matter of religious faith.

    By Blogger Bruce Duensing, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • alanborky-

    It is natural to wonder who we think was the leaker. I can only surmise:

    1) There is not just one leaker.

    2) The "leaking" may have been unintentional.

    That is, all of us naively communicated w/ others about the slides in private conversation or emails. Such work can not be done in isolation and we engaged the assistance and opinions of a very few with whom we felt comfortable. It was believed that these communications were with people who could be trusted. They obviously could not, and for that everyone suffers.

    AJB

    By Blogger Anthony Bragalia, at Sunday, September 29, 2013  

  • So... The slides either don't exist or they're fake and someone is the victim of a scam.

    Either way. There's nothing to see here but flames.

    Popcorn anyone?

    By Blogger Red Eye View, at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • Pure, unassailable Bullshit.

    By Blogger dingdong, at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • AJB wrote: "they may represent the first genuine physical evidence..."

    On what grounds do you describe photographs as "physical" evidence?

    By Blogger Terry the Censor, at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • Prove not to be shown ... - How very convincing!

    By Blogger Rainer Spott, at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • @The Owner of the Sklides and @all

    My Opinion, the Slides shows the same Being like these Photo on these Website:

    http://science.howstuffworks.com/space/aliens-ufos/history-roswell-incident2.htm


    Best regards from Germany

    By Blogger Michael H., at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • Thank you for sharing this information, Tony! The situation is much clearer now. In essence we will have to wait for the owner of these slides to make a decision on how, when and where they will be released publicly.

    If Nick Redfern's recent article has as any bearing on the subject, them money may be a stumbling block. Major media outlets will want exclusive rights and quite probably clear and undeniable provenance.

    I hope the owner of these slides has the sense to make copies for security purposes, it would be very sad if they were to disappear before publication.

    Fingers crossed and best of luck to all involved.

    By Blogger Lee Nicholson, at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • Hi Lee-

    Appreciate the kind comments. Yes, Nick is correct. All of us (likely including media)want confirmed provenance of the slides and the 'who, what, where, when, why and hows' about them answered. And in the midst of trying to get these answers, demands for early disclosure,leaks and betrayals harmed the investigation.

    AJB

    By Blogger Anthony Bragalia, at Monday, September 30, 2013  

  • Hey, I found a box with the lost Ark of the Covenant inside. I want to be recognized for the find but nobody can ever see it because the world isn't worthy.

    What B-S.

    By Blogger Redoubt, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • put up or shut up.

    By Blogger General Striker, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • Seems a non-story without showing the pictures. You might as well say the surviving aliens are staying in your spare room.

    By Blogger 20LEgend, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • Please show the pictures! Please . . . Please . . .
    Pretty Please . . . with a cherry on top . . . I'll be your best friend! ;-)

    By Blogger Deirdre, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • Listen, assy people...

    There are no pictures or photos to be seen, which you would know if you read Mr. Bragalia's posting above.

    RR

    By Blogger RRRGroup, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • There are plenty of legitimate organizations that could subject the pictures to forensic evaluation, if the goal were to determine their authenticity. I suspect something else is going on here. Disinformation? Promotion? A college psych experiment? Let's not waste any more time on this rumor.

    By Blogger Research Department, Teresa, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • Jeez. It's a real catfight in here. Isn't everyone aiming for the same goal (and i don't mean pulling hair and scratching eyes)?

    By Blogger Mesuma, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • AJB wrote - "he will not use the underbelly of the internet to ever release something of such enormity and cosmic import." (and later) "I fear that he has other information that he will release that will truly end any possibility that anyone will ever see the photos."

    How convenient for you.

    AJB wrote - "I suspect he is also calling me and not leaving messages."

    If I were investigating Roswell, I suppose I too would think that every blocked phone solicitor number that calls night and day were a stalker. Have you tried unplugging your phone?

    AJB wrote - "Because of your egos, you have likely denied the world the opportunity to see the unearthly."

    So the first genuine physical evidence of the unearthly which would change humanity will now forever be squelched because you got your feelings hurt on something called the internet? Are you taking your ball and going home? Exactly how many decades did you intend on "investigating"?

    By Blogger Lee Collins, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • This ridiculous. My translation...."Nevermind".

    Make a huge claim of earthshaking evidence and then simply end with "But you will never see the (so called) evidence". How low does it get? Not even "I saw this amazing thing but I didn't have a camera" or, "I saw this amazing thing and the picture is impossibly blurry but.." or, "I did my homework but my dog ate it".

    As I started.....this is ridiculous. As they say, put up or shut up.

    By Blogger Truthseeker, at Tuesday, October 01, 2013  

  • what is the point of telling everyone that pictures have been found of the et's from the roswell ufo crash but they are not going to be shown to the general public. if i was the one who found the pictures i would show them to everyone.

    By Blogger racefanwfo, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • These slides if they actually exist should have had a well documented chain-of-custody and been sent to several photo forensics labs before anything else was done with them and certainly before anything would have 'leaked' out about them.

    This is how science (not psuedo-science, rumor and inuendo) is done.

    Yet another Roswell-linked hoax (Alien Autopsy Film, SERPO, etc).

    By Blogger The Real Zer0 Cool, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • Well that was a load of crap. thanks for the bullshit story,,,,twats

    By Blogger Peter Jones, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • Ummm, seriously people.
    Don't you have other things to do? Something truly meaningful? How about investing time in helping people in need, or animals in need?

    A UFO with extraterrestrial beings crash landed on earth. Wow, mind blowing. But: no evidence. Without evidence no case. It's pretty simple.

    Guess what: I believe there are sentient, intelligent beings out there. In this universe and whatever lies beyond, or in whatever dimension lurks beside ours.
    But you know what? That don't pay my bills. Oh wait... maybe it does - if I get enough gullible people to believe my rantings. Yep that could work.

    As for now all this "they're here", "they were here", "they're coming" chanting is quite boring.

    Do something meaningful with your life. Help others, quit being egomaniacs in a small community of fanatics. Grow up.

    Thx

    By Blogger Wahrheit, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • Why do you even need the photo's? If you read Sanni Ceto's book it will tell you all you need to know about what happened at Roswell, because SHE was there, she was the commander in charge of the ship that crashed. We don't have any need for useless photo's anyway...the information has been published already, for all the world to read.

    By Blogger Kelly, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • I guess we will all have to sit tight and hang on for the ride but think about a few technicallities of trying this on as a hoax.
    Kodachrome is a "reversal" colour film, it's processed to provide a "positive"(colour) image on the "original" film base, negatives etc are _not_ involved, the image taken is seen on the _original_ camera film.
    So _IF_ this film surfaces for examination it's going to be extreamly easy to pin it's date down we are _not_
    dealing with n'th generation B+W prints from the camera original these slides should be camera original, mid 40's
    chemestry and dye layers, and hold in mind that Kodachrome up untill 1955 Kodak were the sole manufacturers AND only they had the chemistry to process that version of Kodachrome it was only in 1955 that they allowed external labs to process the "new" K11 kKodachrome film and process. And before anyone queries "but what if someone's had a stock of this in a freezer", ok so who's going to process the film for you? the chemistry's been obsolete since the mid 50's and only Kodak knew it, todays photolabs will only tackle at the oldest the K14 process and that cam in in the mid 60's. It's a tough nut to crack for a hoaxer?.
    Best Regards
    Neil.

    By Blogger Neil, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • YOU SUCK!!!!!!!!!!

    By Blogger notsolucky, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • Just give a copy to the SETI institute, they will make good use of it.

    By Blogger Ariel Martinez, at Wednesday, October 02, 2013  

  • Wow. That was a whole lot of ...nuthin'.

    I think "Redoubt" said it best:

    "Hey, I found a box with the lost Ark of the Covenant inside. I want to be recognized for the find but nobody can ever see it because the world isn't worthy."

    As did "General Striker":

    "put up or shut up."

    By Blogger Thomas Minker, at Thursday, October 03, 2013  

  • Show the world the photos, or STFU. You're doing nothing good for the field of research or for the topic of Roswell. Get off your high horse and CONTRIBUTE or kindly shut your mouth.

    By Blogger ., at Saturday, October 05, 2013  

  • If only saucer smear were still in publication. We love this trite!

    By Blogger Timothy Brigham, at Tuesday, October 22, 2013  

  • Here's what I don't understand because there is no "I" in Team.

    If there's a team, then you need to be a teamplayer. If the team says lets wait and have more conclusive answers, then as a teamplayer that's what one should do whether they agree or not. It doesn't mean that because you have a difference of opinion that you get to grab your toys and leave the sandpit simply because of a disagreement. Damn it we need questions to be asked, dot the "I's" and cross the "T's" because frankly the public will ask those questions anyway.. wouldn't it be prudent to have the majority of them covered?

    The lack of cooperation and sharing is and will continue to be a problem with UFOlogy because people let their egos get in the way. They'll feel the need to constantly be sitting in the front row seat on the rollercoaster. I see this all too often with those that also solely do the 'talk circuit' after jumping onboard the UFO "Circus of the Stars"...

    I just don't get it anymore

    By OpenID johnnyanonymous, at Sunday, July 20, 2014  

Post a Comment

<< Home