The Horde of Non-Convincing Ufologists
Copyright 2017, InterAmerica, Inc.
Where are the UFO aficionados, ET believers, UFO agnostics, and UFO skeptics who make their UFO case convincing?
Stanton Friedman has been pushing the extraterrestrial slant for UFOs since time immemorial it seems. Has he convinced anyone, really convinced them?
Has anyone in the anti-ETH camp countered his views that have convinced most of that Stanton is wrong?
Robert Sheaffer, Tim Printy, and Donald Menzel or Philip Klass before them, have they made a bona fide skeptical case that resonates with UFO buffs?
The erudite French skeptic Gilles Fernandez has provided reams of UFO material that offsets the vivid views of UFO fanatics, but has he convinced any of them, or those of us on the fence, that his (Gilles’) views are right?
What about the occasional Lance Moody? Has he offered an air-tight rebuttal to any of the UFO hypotheses floating around in his tight milieu?
Did (or do) John Keel’s obtuse musings straighten out the UFO mess?
What about Jacques Vallee’s control agent or Jose Caravaca’s “external agent” (Distortion Theory); have either made a case that convinces anyone that UFOs are presented to us by something beyond us?
And what of Zoam Chomsky’s “UFOs” are nothing but hot air, hot air from blathering UFO addicts? Has he won converts?
Then there are the lesser lights in the UFO community, me among them, have any of them made a good case for or against the prevailing UFO attempts at explanation?
My point? There is no one voice, or any voice, that has shown up in the UFO world who has made a convincing case, one way or another, about the phenomenon that many of us bedraggle or lives with, no one.
And I don’t expect a UFO messiah to show up any time soon.